The
dichotomy between national and foreign universities is quite similar to the
locally made product producers and the importers of foreign
products as the demand of foreign made products become a very big threat to the
local producers.
Consequently,
the producers of the locally made products suffer lost of patronage in the
local market as the foreign made product take the upper hand.
The local producers may suffer great lost if the
importation of those foreign made products are not put under control.
To the
advantage of the government, the Importers of those foreign made products pay Customs dues and bear other associate cost
in the course of importing those products based on the government tariff. On the
other hand the local producers might
have obtained loans from banks and other private sources in order to put the
factory in progress and including
the farm land produce but losing patronage to the Importers,
Wholesalers and Retailers of the foreign made or agricultural imported products.
As the trend
continues, these local producers would cry out to the notice of the government
through their trade associations and Chamber of Commerce of the unfavorable
development.
As this
happens, the government will swing into
action and provide list of prohibited items that are very essential and
gaining much peonage in the market which the local producers can equally
produce in considerable commercial quantity
without scarcity and increase the tariff of other products considered more essential so that their prices will be too
high to the importers and the later would increase the price of the items in
the local market through her trade channels of distribution and the consumers will find it too high to buy. The demand of the foreign products begin to
drop as not every buyer can afford at high price.
This how the
government all over the world regulate the dichotomy issue involving foreign
made product and the locally produced ones.
Based on
this development, the local universities operatives face the same problem
regarding the influx of foreign satellite campuses and affiliations. The only
difference is that the government cannot imposed stringed rules on the foreign universities satellite
campuses based on UNESCO rules provided the foreign institution had been
registered by the government in the country of origin.
However, the
dichotomy issue would arise between the foreign universities operatives and the local universities
operative; whereby the former poised a
very big threat to the later in terms of patronage.
Among the
local universities, the privates sector suffer more than the government institution.
The later backed up by subsided school fees stand the change to compete favorably with the foreign institutions’
Affiliate and Satellite Campuses unlike those of the private sector whose school fees are higher than those of the government
institutions based on the fact that they pay dues to the government, takes responsibility of Lecturer’s wages including the none academic
staff and other administrative cost quite unlike the government institutions
who enjoy the budgetary allocation from the government source in order to cover
administrative cost in addition to the subsidized school fees. So the private institutions
is not their match.
While the
private sector struggle to survive in the midst of the government sponsored
institutions, the foreign institution being patronized by prospective students
double their plight of less patronage while paying their dues to the
government. Consequently, the private operatives would frown at the foreign
operatives recognize as their stronger rival whose school fees may be less than
those of the private institutions or may be equal based on the prevailing
market rare. As this trend continues,
the later would raise alarm regarding the influx of the foreign universities
operatives through their respective associations in order to reduce their number.
Based on
this development, the educational authority in the country would go into
thorough scrutiny of those foreign operatives in order to reduce their number. During the exercise, they would carry out their investigation as to
determine which of them is approved or legalized in the country of origin based
on UNESCO rules; will take into consideration of the legitimacy of the Degree Awarding institutions
through the satellite campuses whether directly from the university or fake.
Most of
those investigations would be carried out through the respective embassies of
the foreign institutions. At the end, the
government would shortlist names of those foreign institutions and their
operatives that are not allowed to award degrees.
This will go
a long way to reduce the number of those foreign operative and increase the patronage
of the private institutions.
No comments:
Post a Comment